From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <6fac925fd05c80234a681dfced8ae873@terzarima.net> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:58:03 +0100 To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: <0e4d6626707932b2af5bcf1e1c660659@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] cheep ssds Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0be05980-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i've had one potentially important ssd fail within 15 hours of my copying stuff onto it; it failed completely (ie, the bios hung up probing it). the drive was marked "refurbished", which makes me think i was rather a victim of an experiment (``can we refurbish ssds that have previously shown a fatal failure?'' ... `perhaps not!'). otherwise, i've had nothing but luck with ssds: they are fast, quiet, and withstand movement.