From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:18:47 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <6fe792a6937e8e23ab679036748b5cd7@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <3c03af7d31e57a9359d2aade038dd88b@vitanuova.com> <6382a3fce81dc84bf423fa25fca25da9@ladd.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p vs http Topicbox-Message-UUID: 812a4738-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > > i claim that a fs with this behavior would be broken.  intro(5) > > seems to agree with this claim, unless i'm misreading. > > you're right - fossil is broken in this respect, as is exportfs > {cd /mnt/term/dev; ls -lq | sort} for a quick demo. so what's fossil's excuse? - erik