9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil caching venti errors
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:31:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7074eaeba3db257fbc8ddf9c9d169cae@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090328162750.GG22497@masters6.cs.jhu.edu>

> AFAIK the disk is doing just fine.  Moreover, even during the period when
> fossil is complaining, venti/read on 9fs's score works just fine.  So I
> don't believe the fault is venti's.

i don't believe that conclusion is warranted.
/sys/src/cmd/fossil/cache.c:683,684
is where this condition gets set.  so either
the read fails or the score or length is bad.
%r is not set (see a few lines down) so when
combined with this report:

> This is likely too large a hammer, but when this happens I rebuild the venti index
> so that I can get past the issue.  I see this more under Plan 9 than p9p.  The
> block in error always exists in an arena and a checkarenas reports no errors.
> The problem usually persists across reboots until I reconstitute the index.

it's reasonable to guess that the block returned
might not be the right one.

in principle, this could be a drive failure,
bad memory or a venti bug. i don't have a
lot of venti experience, but i think this
/sys/src/cmd/venti/srv/lump.c:226,230
is where venti reads and it seems to insure
that the initial read double-checks scores.
it would 1e-80 hard for a drive error
to sneak by, so that leaves us with memory
errors or venti cache bugs.

it's hard to see how reindexing would fix
a cache bug, though.  so maybe i'm all wet.

it would be interesting to know if the score
of the block returned by venti/read is correct.

- erik



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-28 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-28  3:48 Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-03-28 11:11 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-03-28 14:47   ` david bulkow
2009-03-28 15:13   ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-28 16:27   ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-03-28 17:31     ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2009-03-28 18:40       ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-04-08 14:44   ` Richard Miller
2009-04-08 14:56     ` ron minnich
2009-04-08 15:36       ` C H Forsyth
2009-04-08 15:55       ` Richard Miller
2009-04-08 16:46     ` cinap_lenrek
2009-04-08 17:01     ` cinap_lenrek
2009-04-08 17:28       ` Richard Miller
2009-04-08 17:41         ` cinap_lenrek
2009-04-08 18:18           ` Richard Miller
2009-04-08 17:36     ` Steve Simon
2009-03-28 20:38 erik quanstrom
2009-03-30 11:45 ` C H Forsyth
2009-03-30 11:55   ` C H Forsyth
2009-03-30 19:06     ` lucio
2009-03-30 19:15       ` erik quanstrom
2009-03-30 16:19 Pavel Klinkovsky
2010-01-08  6:53 Josef Artur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7074eaeba3db257fbc8ddf9c9d169cae@quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).