From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:22:33 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <713e9979e01fcc423c847c3c10c2966d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <243d3bdc948fc07dee0bd349ad34511f@rei2.9hal>
References: <243d3bdc948fc07dee0bd349ad34511f@rei2.9hal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Regarding 9p based "protocols" message framing
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6dc1b84c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

thanks, that's great.

the retransmission interval is probally off by 3/4
orders of magnitude for today's local networks.
50-500=C2=B5s would be a decent static retransmit interval.

(goes to show that timing sleeps in ms anachronistic.)

- erik