From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: quanstro@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom)
Date: Sun,  3 Apr 2011 05:16:05 -0400
Subject: [9fans] Go Plan 9
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinPNkhQ--+1q0EkfQQWYFh_zb=Q=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3gx8QK7O-+O=R8oFELTt6WgVHO3dJV51cZiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=7L-mqU=mFODnGcYCmyvR02M=MLFzKPpH2v2B1@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim1g8pebwHbUEtLocwfuYzvxErqwuvAe5pF-+pT@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTinPNkhQ--+1q0EkfQQWYFh_zb=Q=A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <717880839d1135de6219e3753418b81a@ladd.quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c66bfe72-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat Apr  2 22:49:25 EDT 2011, robpike at gmail.com wrote:
> We'll get the Plan 9 implementation up to scratch. It's not there yet,
> though.  Once things look solid we'll need a volunteer to set up a
> builder so we can automatically make sure the Plan 9 port stays
> current.

okay, i volunteer.  just to make sure, we're talking
about a plan 9 port, not a cross compile?

just let me know what i need to get set up.  i can
easily do 386 and arm at this point.

- erik