From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7200cc88a67dd3ca1d70186b7ffc46f0@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] change for libthread/ioproc.c
From: David Gordon Hogan <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <973150fb54396b0515b31083d9e456c3@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:24:08 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4a08f39a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> 	when you create an ioproc and later interrupt it with iointerrupt,
> (since there's no handler set) the xioproc process dies. This means that
> the process performing the iocall hangs forever waiting in the receive from
> the ioproc channel.

I just changed iointerrupt() to post "threadint" instead of "interrupt".
"threadint" is ignored by _threadnote(), which should have the desired
effect.  Update on sources.