From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 17:35:40 -0700 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <72179c21822f36216c7669a1f125f32e@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <20151019000914.GA65657@wopr.sciops.net> References: <324d02717849dcd7f9aa8e55277f8ca4@brasstown.quanstro.net> <20151019000914.GA65657@wopr.sciops.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others Topicbox-Message-UUID: 73bc1bd2-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sun Oct 18 17:11:11 PDT 2015, khm@sciops.net wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 04:59:44PM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote: > > On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9nut@9netics.com wrote: > > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a > > > > year ago, but I just can't remember what it was! > > > > > > are you looking for Internet Link (IL)? > > > > there's also rudp, which if i have gotten my second-hand stories straight, was used on > > the pathstar backplane. > > > > - erik > > > > I second this. Aleksandar, you should investigate RUDP as soon as > possible. for clarity, i was neither recommending or not recommending rudp, as i know nothing about the problem to be solved except for the tidbits "fpga" and "vnc", neither of which are something i've spent much time with. good luck! - erik