9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
@ 2001-10-09 17:08 forsyth
  2001-10-10  8:56 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-10-09 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --]

you can download all you need of Inferno, including the source for Charon,
free of charge and with a licence that's at least as liberal as the Plan 9
one.

>> From this it sounds rather as if splufty new applications for Plan 9
>>are not going to happen, and that new work is all happening over in
>>Inferno land.  Is that accurate?

not at all, it's just that in this particular case, an HTML 3.x browser (with common 3.x extensions)
and Ecmascript exists, with reasonably small source (and it is being extended to 4.x etc).
it's hard work to start one of those from scratch, and if porting one of the existing ones,
good luck.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2214 bytes --]

To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:18:27 GMT
Message-ID: <87vghog663.fsf@becket.becket.net>

forsyth@vitanuova.com writes:

> >>Inferno != Plan 9.
> >>There is no web browser in Plan 9---and that's got to be a big obstacle.
> 
> Inferno runs hosted under Plan 9 and Charon runs in that environment.
> we'll be blurring the boundaries further as well, at least for Plan 9.

Yeah, but Plan 9 is "free", at least in scare quotes, and AFAICT
Inferno is not.  "It runs under Inferno" is therefore considerably
materially different than Plan 9.

 From this it sounds rather as if splufty new applications for Plan 9
are not going to happen, and that new work is all happening over in
Inferno land.  Is that accurate?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Re[3]: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
@ 2001-10-10 10:43 forsyth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: forsyth @ 2001-10-10 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 101 bytes --]

we can't get the bandwidth (at sensible cost) except through an ISP and
none of them use Plan 9.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2269 bytes --]

From: Matt <matt@proweb.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re[3]: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:58:46 +0100
Message-ID: <72257595172.20011010105846@proweb.co.uk>


M> http://cgi.www.vitanuova.com/cgi-bin/www.vitanuova.com/idown.pl
Connected to www.vitanuova.com.
GET / HTTP/1.0

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:53:58 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.3 Demon/2.0 (Unix)


Apache & perl !
not very plan9 :)

has anybody managed to compile Apache in APE?

M

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-11  9:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-09 17:08 Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp) forsyth
2001-10-10  8:56 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-10  9:23   ` Re[2]: " Matt
2001-10-10  9:24   ` Matt
2001-10-10  9:58     ` Re[3]: " Matt
2001-10-10  9:55   ` Mike Haertel
2001-10-10 10:09     ` Lucio De Re
2001-10-11  9:10   ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2001-10-10 10:43 Re[3]: " forsyth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).