From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7359f04904050617022f003f0@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme Zerox: Get lost
In-Reply-To: <0c3cbbafec2cb30a9cfa2f3bce5c6158@terzarima.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <0c3cbbafec2cb30a9cfa2f3bce5c6158@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  6 May 2004 17:02:37 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7350eb8e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Thu, 6 May 2004 11:05:52 +0100, Charles Forsyth
<forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
>
> i'd got the feeling once that a lost edit might
> have been explained if Get hadn't worked on my Zerox'd file,
> and took a moment just now to find that indeed Get
> was ignored when applied to any frame of a file
> with several Zerox'd views.
>
> that's because in /sys/src/cmd/acme/exec.c:/^get\( if t->file->ntext>1 get
> moans if the several-window thing is a directory, and then
> returns.  but it always returns!  i suspect
> the return should be attached to the moan.

absolutely. stupid bug. i know how it happened.

-rob