From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Fri,  3 Oct 2008 13:34:20 -0400
Message-ID: <73af49a22d09fa78285691cfee2c7747@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d00810031011hee05bebo4c37511c7542bb5e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a560a5d00810030939i7f337a84t5763d3f039ec07b5@mail.gmail.com>
	<14ec7b180810030952x232d9cd3p1d5d1e969ab28a8a@mail.gmail.com>
	<a560a5d00810031011hee05bebo4c37511c7542bb5e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] control-F completion question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 16dbac02-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I might again be wrong, but I thought the reason why the completion is not
> in the rc is partially thanks to the fact, that rc doesn't know anything you
> type until you press 'enter'. Only rio knows. (But all this is based only on
> my possibly broken opinion...)
> But yes, the best would be (for me and I guess for everybody, since we
> usually speak to rc when we need the completion) to be as close to the rc's
> namespace as possible.
> Correct me, please, if I am completely off the road... :)
>
> Ruda

really? i use completion in the acme tag line more often.

- erik