From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] More 'Sam I am'
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:40:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73ea803ef6b49df7cd7a07abdc3e3de3@quanstro.net> (raw)
i don't miss the vaxen i used to work on with h29 2400 baud "stonet"
terminals and often a 1+ minute login time. 2400 baud is slow enough
that i used to use ^s/^q as a pager
mt xinu 4.3bvd (sic).
- erik
On Fri Feb 10 21:03:01 CST 2006, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Many years ago now, a good friend of mine remarked that
> if we actually made all those whining about the state of things
> now compared to the "good old days" go back to using v7 Unix,
> they would quickly realise that times had actually moved
> forward and there were things they were used to that it didn't
> have and that they really needed. I used v[567] and I've
> ported v7, and I wouldn't go back. From what I understand,
> Plan 9 was an attempt to build on that by saying "this got
> us so far, but times are changing and it won't cut it with
> networks, bitmapped displays, SMP etc, we need a better base".
> That was a long time ago and no one has, to my limited
> non- computer science knowledge, attempted anything similar,
> they're all still working on copying 30 year old technology.
>
> I don't have an iPod, my mobile phone is 5 years old and I
> turn it on about 4 hours a week and there are many things
> about the 21st century that make me grumpy. But you can't go
> back. You should, however, be careful about how how you
> go forward.
>
> --jim
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-11 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-11 3:40 quanstro [this message]
2006-02-11 3:46 ` [9fans] Mt. Xinu Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-14 21:42 ` plan9
2006-02-14 22:03 ` Brantley Coile
2006-02-14 22:48 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-15 4:39 ` Jim McKie
2006-02-15 6:29 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-15 13:04 ` namec (was Re: [9fans] Strange date/time on some created files) rog
2006-02-15 13:07 ` rog
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-24 13:36 [9fans] More 'Sam I am' quanstro
2006-02-24 13:49 ` Anselm R. Garbe
2006-02-24 14:24 ` Gabriel Ivanes
2006-02-24 0:55 quanstro
2006-02-24 3:46 ` yard-ape
2006-02-24 4:40 ` Lucio De Re
2006-02-25 7:43 ` Serge Gagnon
2006-04-24 18:05 ` Serge Gagnon
2006-02-11 4:48 quanstro
2006-02-11 11:22 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-11 0:10 quanstro
2006-02-11 3:01 ` jmk
2006-02-10 16:49 quanstro
2006-02-10 15:22 quanstro
2006-02-10 14:09 quanstro
2006-02-10 14:15 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-10 15:17 ` John Stalker
2006-02-10 13:44 quanstro
2006-02-10 13:57 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-10 12:28 Aharon Robbins
2006-02-10 12:51 ` Dave Lukes
2006-02-10 14:04 ` Wes Kussmaul
2006-02-10 16:15 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-02-10 17:22 ` Wes Kussmaul
2006-02-10 17:41 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-02-10 18:21 ` Wes Kussmaul
2006-02-10 20:32 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-11 4:36 ` Marina Brown
2006-02-11 4:39 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-11 5:06 ` jmk
2006-02-11 6:52 ` lucio
2006-02-10 15:17 ` uriel
2006-02-10 17:42 ` Bakul Shah
2006-02-08 4:34 Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-08 5:29 ` Russ Cox
2006-02-08 5:51 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-08 6:14 ` Russ Cox
2006-02-08 6:30 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-08 6:46 ` geoff
2006-02-08 6:50 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-08 17:31 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-08 18:14 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-08 21:28 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-10 9:47 ` Aharon Robbins
2006-02-10 10:45 ` Steve Simon
2006-02-10 14:40 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-10 22:53 ` lucio
2006-02-23 22:52 ` Victor Nazarov
2006-02-10 11:05 ` uriel
2006-02-10 12:59 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-08 18:20 ` uriel
2006-02-08 19:50 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-08 21:35 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-08 21:43 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-02-08 22:57 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-02-09 0:03 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-09 0:17 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-02-09 0:26 ` Dan Cross
2006-02-09 0:43 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-02-09 1:11 ` andrey mirtchovski
2006-02-09 1:47 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-02-09 1:56 ` Marina Brown
2006-02-09 2:35 ` Federico Benavento
2006-02-09 7:34 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-02-09 20:11 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-02-09 16:06 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-02-09 22:44 ` Marina Brown
2006-02-09 23:06 ` Bakul Shah
2006-02-10 1:37 ` Micah Stetson
2006-02-08 22:58 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-02-09 13:04 ` LiteStar numnums
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73ea803ef6b49df7cd7a07abdc3e3de3@quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).