From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 06:10:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7436bb91b36cca81f0b3d9b63433d2c4@9srv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa14cd69973674f5e8c8ff57044932bf@terzarima.net>
i also like IL in theory (and much prefer it to tcp, certainly).
but it's increasingly difficult to use. maintaining the code is
the smallest part of this issue. most nat boxes will choke
outright or drop the packets on the floor (actually, will any
pass IL?), and many ISPs won't deal well with IL, either. you
just don't get real, unfiltered IP any more (at least reliably).
it's also frustrating that IL never got outside Plan 9 and
Inferno (and one now-defunct BSD project). it makes the
cost/benefit ratio for working to get IL passed much less
enticing if i can't, say, drawterm using it.
of course, you could s/IL/9P/g in that last paragraph without
affecting the truth value of the statement.
ア
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-23 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 3:44 boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 3:50 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 4:01 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-23 4:04 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 4:57 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-23 5:09 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 5:33 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-23 5:39 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-27 6:53 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 8:06 ` Richard Miller
2004-04-23 8:12 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 8:38 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 8:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 8:35 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 8:43 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-23 9:24 ` a
2004-04-23 10:04 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 10:10 ` a [this message]
2004-04-23 12:38 ` Brantley Coile
2004-04-23 12:51 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 17:13 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 8:38 ` Axel Belinfante
2004-04-23 8:39 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-23 8:42 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 8:44 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-23 8:48 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 8:55 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 9:48 ` Richard Miller
2004-04-23 9:56 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-24 22:41 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-25 3:35 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-25 19:48 ` Dave Lukes
2004-04-25 21:44 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-26 18:38 ` rog
2004-04-23 19:15 ` rog
2004-04-23 19:37 ` Russ Cox
2004-04-23 22:33 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-23 14:34 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-04-23 16:33 ` 9nut
2004-04-23 17:37 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 17:26 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 8:51 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 8:58 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 9:03 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 9:08 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-04-23 11:23 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 12:19 ` C H Forsyth
2004-04-23 12:17 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 12:34 ` Brantley Coile
2004-04-23 14:38 ` ron minnich
2004-04-23 14:42 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2004-04-23 14:47 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-04-23 8:54 ` Dave Lukes
2004-04-23 9:03 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 12:25 ` Brantley Coile
2004-04-23 16:02 ` 9nut
2004-04-27 6:52 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-04-23 6:53 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-23 4:07 ` boyd, rounin
2004-04-27 12:52 Dan Cross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7436bb91b36cca81f0b3d9b63433d2c4@9srv.net \
--to=a@9srv.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).