From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:46:22 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <74bab30800fb07a2511d904bb2ea4b95@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.1004261828060.19994@malasada.lava.net>
References: <k2hfe41879c1004251656id6976800scb02b96f89f5cb40@mail.gmail.com>
	<fba0cac2c9a2d1add33cd834fb31253d@quintile.net>
	<w2lfe41879c1004251750y1cb77ea9ob221543f0506ccb7@mail.gmail.com>
	<A49BBF89-41D7-4AFE-BDCF-D0BF246879CB@gmail.com>
	<z2tfe41879c1004260033q204491f4zfc717d6cf80ffdd1@mail.gmail.com>
	<23E784B6-F189-4DFC-AA82-21CA950DD77D@gmail.com>
	<g2ofe41879c1004261300sb80d702dy9f2a491801c603a9@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.1004261828060.19994@malasada.lava.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Distributed Pipelines
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0f8e1398-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Apr 27 00:31:03 EDT 2010, newsham@lava.net wrote:
> What about some mounting/binding hackery where you replace
> /dev/cons so that the original "cpu" command works?

why the resistance to il?  rx is a good example of il's strengths.
in order for cpu to work, it uses 2 extra processes.  rx is much
more efficient.  (and 1/4 the code) great for your trusted network.
or perhaps your local supercomputer.

rx doesn't do encryption.  a srx using ssl/tls would be
able to sneak a 0 write through since the record layer
should expand that into a application record with
application data length of 0.

- erik