From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:13:35 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <74d0fe59cd997dda6e0c6df2d0be1cd7@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <20110602020849.12628B827@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <3c94c382decb6fec1b6fe5df7b29da66@ladd.quanstro.net> <37aa028227cbf68318c2703b7c6bf5ae@ladd.quanstro.net> <20110602014224.198F4B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <8407135a853d719d822d33eb6f5d014d@ladd.quanstro.net> <20110602020849.12628B827@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] icmp unreachable messages sometimes dropped Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea526448-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Jun 1 22:09:27 EDT 2011, bakul@bitblocks.com wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 22:05:49 EDT erik quanstrom wrote: > > > > See rfc1122 2.4.3.9. > > > > > > ENOTFOUND > > > > i'm not sure what your point is. and there's no such section in rfc 1122. > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#section-2.4 > > Sorry. 4.2.3.9 okay, could you explain some more. are you agreeing that plan 9 tcp has a problem? - erik