From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <74e3492a0804190936k3d44bfbft12bff1a3f805d96a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:36:48 +0300 From: "Harri Haataja" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <165a6b9d60bce2dd5cce90c5f18c1069@quanstro.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] VIA Rhine II mii problems Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9537712c-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 19/04/2008, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > I initialised the mii struct to use phy 1, as mii() would have if it > had succeeded. Unfortunately running ip/ipconfig simply sat there, > running it with the debug flag showed recv timeouts. I could not see > any packets on the network. On the slight chance that this is useful, I have never seen a VIA chip that worked reliably (never tried their processors, though). Especially the Rhine based pci cards my then employer once had would periodically freeze and require a full power cycle before they'd work for a while again if at all. This happened under several windows versions on PC, Linux, possibly some BSD. Varied drivers and other hardware anyway. We quickly decided it wasn't worth even trying and went with another chip since eth cards aren't hugely expensive. Finns can also cheerfully call anything with a VIA chip "viallinen", which literally meens "something with via" while being a word meaning "defective". It's pretty much true on both counts. -- I appear to be temporarily using gmail's horrible interface. I apologise for any failure in my part in trying to make it do the right thing with post formatting.