From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <757050202256e322181981c36cf96101@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] permission bit of /mail/box
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
In-Reply-To: <9ab9f5fd9ed2f70293e8d8f61c1a2167@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:34:17 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 409a8fc0-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> weekend. I resorted to /mail/lib/patters because the spam filter
> does not seem to be enough by now to stop it. Is the same happening
> to you?

When I logged in to my 9terminal this morning.
I thought something wrong happened to our system.
It's too much of junk mails such as MS Custermer, Update, returned
mail...

As long as the noarchive bit concerns, I believe it's worth to have
some test implementation to our fossil server.   After that, then we
can decide which is better.   To have a 'other' file system is not a
bad idea at now.  Because we have no other choise.   However, if we
don't have problem when we have that bit installed,  it looks like not
so cool solution to me.

Kenji