From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:43:31 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <759514f5611cac11b1692bce14901b99@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACm3i_j1dxqY=sfunozAXRY+uhO83BnTodfpWvNb+4rSNouC_g@mail.gmail.c>
References: <1310400339.71319.YahooMailClassic@web30908.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<CAK8RtFrvW2mT5ubAb73WqFJ563H_E-2YkYMY+rOXsSivAKSZGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACm3i_j1dxqY=sfunozAXRY+uhO83BnTodfpWvNb+4rSNouC_g@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] GNU/Linux/Plan 9 disto
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ff31fdc4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Notice though that the kernel and applications need
> some more that only the extensions. All of it (including the
> assembler) is written supposing caller save
> and other inner specifics of kencc that would need to be dealt with
> when compiling
> for gcc. It would be a port, not only a recompilation.

not only that.  waserror() depends on callee-save.

- erik