From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <763c4f9e3d5fccba4ae4ea6ba9f662f7@cat-v.org> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] acme + mh Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:34:34 +0100 From: uriel@cat-v.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: f2d2de32-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:29:00 -0500 Serge Gagnon >> wrote: >> >>... >> >> Sylpheed is not bad. >> > >> > I've been using sylpheed-claws for about 4 years now. It has good >> > points, and bad points, but mostly it's OK. I had been wondering >> > about changing to t'bird, in order to get dynamic folders, but >> having >> > read this, maybe I'll stay put! >> > >> > Martin >> >> I am a (mostly) happy acme/Mail user, but I am always interested in >> finding better ways to do things, where can I find all this mail >> readers everyone is talking about? I don't see any of them in >> sources/contrib... > > believe it or not, there are operating systems besides plan 9. > these tend to have much more software available. And we all know that more is always better. So why are we are using this OS that doesn't have so "much more software available"? or are we? maybe I got lost and into the wrong mailing list... uriel