From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:40:14 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <76d7a60797aaaf2cb054a43b78310525@plug.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101028153711.GC5777@masters1.cs.jhu.edu>
References: <AANLkTinEZZu-8qKfh6u3qdcJbcE6M_=eQjqBxP_2PkCG@mail.gmail.com>
	<d555a1ae7e1735204d7ee20381034260@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTikj+kT7f_UHMmXeBXd1NmfqBWP7oaeShywowv3D@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinKOfMCGoE6H1tb3n=o4kjaLuTrr6V5H-USQt+T@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimFNWT4VToNtp6vZ1bENfDFindbd5oRC+fs=_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikTbRwviRPBmpjfBRSD0Rs+egRUUaXk2ex7p_Db@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101028153711.GC5777@masters1.cs.jhu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] A little more ado about async Tclunk
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 70766b2e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Nowhere in the manual does it say that.  The only protocol-defined way to be
> sure that you are coherent is to use Twstat with all arguments NOP.  (FWIW,
> this may also be superior to checking that Tclunk did not Rerror because the
> fid is still live if Twstat Rerrors.)

name 3 in-distribution fileservers that respect this tradition uniformly.

- erik