From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d1905022308181e98db0c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:18:12 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Evolving rio / GUI development In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7359f049050223051738e718f3@mail.gmail.com> <627059e81b43bd5362e0b8237ed9841d@plan9.escet.urjc.es> <775b8d1905022305394e994527@mail.gmail.com> <7359f04905022307375329d50d@mail.gmail.com> <775b8d19050223075311c9e0e2@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 530dfd98-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 what about the lonely "try" keyword? what if all you need is a "penalty goal". this is getting silly, back to work. brucee On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:06:56 -0700 (MST), Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > > Indeed perhaps the best aspect of C++ coding is embedding > > puns in the code Haven't had this much fun since COBOL. > > blast. We need a PERFORM verb. > > ron >