From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d1905051014201664544@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:20:10 +1000
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sleep-complexity
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e6050510140254b49876@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <35f6f399b29a91e456132e3e1a022fc4@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<014401c5558e$f82839f0$aafb7d50@kilgore>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0505101327250.20942@enigma.lanl.gov>
	<3e1162e6050510140254b49876@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4963b07e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

some standards/people need to be violated - with extreme prejudice.

brucee

On 5/11/05, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/05, Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2005, boyd, rounin wrote:
> >
> > > > what was their choice?
> > >
> > > long =3D=3D 64 bits
> > > int =3D=3D 32 bits
> > > short =3D=3D 16 bits
> > >
> > > i argued:
> > >
> > > long =3D=3D 32 bits
> > > int =3D=3D 64 bits
> > > short =3D=3D 16 bits
> >
> > IIRC that is what SGI did, correct?
> >
>=20
> That would violate the C standard.
>=20
> sizeof (short) <=3D sizeof(int) <=3D sizeof(long) <=3D sizeof(long long).
>=20
> I doubt anyone did this.
>=20
> > ron
> >
>