From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190505231047207086d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 03:47:30 +1000
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil/venti memory allocation?
In-Reply-To: <9773.1116866132@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <9773.1116866132@piper.nectar.cs.cmu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 50b5eaa4-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

there has been suggestions before (check the list and wiki).
i've found that being generous to fossil is a good thing and
make sure you have swap on for those little moments when
you, ahh, need a bit of swap.

brucee

On 5/24/05, Dave Eckhardt <davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
> Let's say I have a auth/fossil/venti server with
> 512 meg of RAM (430 meg free when everything
> is running with default configurations).
>=20
> Anybody want to suggest how I might allocate
> that among:
> * fossil block cache  (open -c xxx)
> * venti block cache   (mem xxx)
> * venti disk cache    (bcmem xxx)
> * venti index cache   (icmem xxx)
> * memory left over for cron, tftpd, etc.
>=20
> Dave Eckhardt
>