From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190601040302w5c497abcnd4725474c789a4ff@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:02:21 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] The mother-of-all-gnot? In-Reply-To: <63349e4f7ae73a58077654a3cd628027@vitanuova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060104035629.COKE29167.ibm61aec.bellsouth.net@p1.stuart.org> <63349e4f7ae73a58077654a3cd628027@vitanuova.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d10c9158-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 good memory. On 1/4/06, C H Forsyth wrote: > >Speaking of such things. Is there NAT support in either Plan 9 > >or Inferno? I looked around and if it's there, I'm missing it. > > i had a quick look at the archives but couldn't find the right article. > still, a previous time this was discussed, i think it was stated > by that the nat code hadn't been released because it was consid= ered > at the time to compete with a lucent product