From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190601050424u7e2e00f8xf1a54a9a98e346fd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:24:32 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] The mother-of-all-gnot? In-Reply-To: <20060105032249.FRUX5113.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@p1.stuart.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <63349e4f7ae73a58077654a3cd628027@vitanuova.com> <20060105032249.FRUX5113.ibm64aec.bellsouth.net@p1.stuart.org> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d2681054-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 sorry, i've had a very eventful (last) year so ozinferno ain't out yet. sorry that i'm actually testing it and fixing bugs. garbage collection is now another order of magnitude more efficient. there is still one nasty which i have tracked but not fixed. brucee On 1/5/06, Brian L. Stuart wrote: > In message <63349e4f7ae73a58077654a3cd628027@vitanuova.com>, C H Forsyth = writes > : > >>Speaking of such things. Is there NAT support in either Plan 9 > >>or Inferno? I looked around and if it's there, I'm missing it. > > > >i had a quick look at the archives but couldn't find the right article. > >still, a previous time this was discussed, i think it was stated > >by that the nat code hadn't been released because it was consi= dered > >at the time to compete with a lucent product > > Oh well. I had thought it would be fun to change my router/NAT > box over to Inferno from an old Linux install. But I guess it'll > have to wait. > > Thanks, > BLS >