From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190601142237u41c081cfu4486e29f98f63091@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:37:18 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] WRT54G Port? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <78DDE11A-7C53-47AC-ACA7-16C32C42D06B@orthanc.ca> <87fdb4b1be8930fcefef758f4a98e393@collyer.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d79ebfb4-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 the easiest way is if you have the right firmware there is an easy backdoor that allows me to download ozinferno emu to linux (which runs on the router). running native is more than possible but emu sufficed. brucee On 1/15/06, zuzu wrote: > On 1/14/06, geoff@collyer.net wrote: > > I believe it was inferno ported, by brucee, not plan 9. I would like > > to get either for the wrt54g. > > looking into the linux port for this embedded device, i was careful to no= tice: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRT54G > > Unfortunately, following version 5 of the WRT54G, it will no longer > accept third party firmware as it is no longer a Linux-driven device. > > Around the same time WRT54G v5 emerged Linksys basically re-released > the WRT54G v4 (which allows for third party firmware) under the new > model name WRT54GL with stock firmware version 4.30.0(US). > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Lyndon Nerenberg > > To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> > > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:11:10 -0800 > > Subject: [9fans] WRT54G Port? > > Once upon a time I thought I read that Plan 9 had been ported to said > > device. But now Google wants to prove me wrong. Did this ever happen? > > > > --lyndon > > > > >