From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190601151733t72fb1b3apf2ca2bd64cf5de84@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:33:14 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] WRT54G Port? In-Reply-To: <4ac314f12fc14d10ba6919dafd73392c@terzarima.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43CAE459.2080205@lanl.gov> <4ac314f12fc14d10ba6919dafd73392c@terzarima.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d81cf078-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I do recall that you had to have the *right* linux wrt but newer ones could be *downgraded*. vxworks? yuck. no chance of getting emu to run on that crap. linux/pthreads is icky enough. brucee On 1/16/06, Charles Forsyth wrote: > > and, well, I wonder how much a company like that enjoyed releasing its > > software as required by GPL. > > it's not as though they'd overlooked the ``cheat's charter'' FAQs publish= ed by > some of the embedded linux companies (ie, how to use GPL'd linux > without publishing some of the interesting source). > they were already distributing important modules binary-only.