9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Maybe it is april fool's after all ...
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:06:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <775b8d190601202006m7b89b1f7o6f54e516f38ba0cf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e949c0a389b266a652f31e3260f294c@plan9.bell-labs.com>

it would certainly be more fun if the a significant amount of
open source wasn't open crap.

brucee

On 1/21/06, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Excuses, excuses. I thought the mantra was "Given enough
> eyeballs all bugs are shallow"? Maybe they should augment the
> rooms full of penguins typing code with rooms full of spiders
> giving it the eight-eyeball lookover. Also, what is behind
> the eyeballs, the skills can be shallower than the bugs.
>
> --jim
>
> On Fri Jan 20 17:20:26 EST 2006, pawel.lasek@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 1/20/06, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > > Compatibility mode? Why? Surely you just recompile the programme for
> > > the target machine, you have the source, after all. A minute, tops.
> > >
> > > --jim
> >
> > It comes from the fact that some of the code is not-so-portable -
> > OpenOffice 1x being popular example (don't know about 2.0), as it
> > didn't compile on amd64 (some bugs in the code, remember, it comes
> > back from StarDivision and OS/2 :D). There's a lot more of it,
> > thaknfully limited mostly to closed-source software.
> >
> > M$ is having the same trouble, having to supply 386 IE for basically
> > every architecture NT is working on (From what I remember, 386 IE is
> > included in Alpha, IA-64 and AMD64 ones) :)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paweł Lasek
> > "Once a hitokiri, always a hitokiri. This will never change" - Jine-Ei
> On Fri Jan 20 17:20:26 EST 2006, pawel.lasek@gmail.com wrote:
> > On 1/20/06, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> > > Compatibility mode? Why? Surely you just recompile the programme for
> > > the target machine, you have the source, after all. A minute, tops.
> > >
> > > --jim
> >
> > It comes from the fact that some of the code is not-so-portable -
> > OpenOffice 1x being popular example (don't know about 2.0), as it
> > didn't compile on amd64 (some bugs in the code, remember, it comes
> > back from StarDivision and OS/2 :D). There's a lot more of it,
> > thaknfully limited mostly to closed-source software.
> >
> > M$ is having the same trouble, having to supply 386 IE for basically
> > every architecture NT is working on (From what I remember, 386 IE is
> > included in Alpha, IA-64 and AMD64 ones) :)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paweł Lasek
> > "Once a hitokiri, always a hitokiri. This will never change" - Jine-Ei
>

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-21  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-19 17:54 Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-19 20:43 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-19 22:28   ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-20 11:58     ` Devon H. O'Dell
2006-01-20 16:08       ` jmk
2006-01-20 16:13         ` andrey mirtchovski
2006-01-20 22:19         ` Paweł Lasek
2006-01-21  4:01           ` jmk
2006-01-21  4:06             ` Bruce Ellis [this message]
2006-01-21  4:26               ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-21  5:09                 ` jmk
2006-01-21  6:20                   ` uriel
2006-01-21  8:36                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-21  7:42                       ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-21 13:09                   ` Brantley Coile
2006-01-21 16:37                   ` Ronald G. Minnich
2006-01-21 18:49                     ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-21 19:43                   ` David Leimbach
2006-01-21 21:13                     ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-21 13:11                 ` Brantley Coile
2006-01-20 17:33       ` David Leimbach
2006-01-20 17:36         ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-20 17:53           ` jmk
2006-01-20 18:10             ` Dave Lukes
2006-01-20 18:38               ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-21 19:29               ` Marina Brown
2006-01-20 20:14             ` Ronald G Minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=775b8d190601202006m7b89b1f7o6f54e516f38ba0cf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bruce.ellis@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).