From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190601231013vb4a9661x92d09c2a0abee971@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:13:35 +1100 From: Bruce Ellis To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net> <43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov> Topicbox-Message-UUID: e42ef6ae-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 More protocols! More conversions! Call me old-fashioned but i still use styx whenever possible. Some people like metallica, i like berlioz. brucee On 1/24/06, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > On 1/23/06, Ronald G Minnich wrote: > > In fact, fuse may be just good enough, and v9fs came in just late > > enough, that in the long term, fuse is what "wins" on linux, in the > > sense that most people may end up using fuse, since there are already > > pretty good examples for people to follow. We'll see. > > > > Lucho's made some good progress on this front. We've proposed a > tutorial at OLS (which may also generate a DeveloperWorks tutorial) > which will cover how to write synthetic file systems for 9P and also > cover some of the tradeoffs between 9P and FUSE. > > -eric >