From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190603092244g7f33516fo59d02bd19462a7ad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:44:54 +1100
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] bge
In-Reply-To: <20060309233204.GC2920@augusta.math.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <682b3e41a24ef46605ea2d7c2e5582ac@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<85f1dbf5e47591c036d98e933dec64cb@cat-v.org>
	<20060309233204.GC2920@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1137b4ec-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Dan, some people have unusual skills.  Let's play pool again.

brucee

On 3/10/06, Dan Cross <cross@math.psu.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:45:03PM +0100, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> > As russ explained, the replacement for 9load is a standard Plan 9
> > kernel.  I am still thinking about what the best way design the user
> > space bits that parse the plan9.ini invoque /dev/reboot. I'm happy to
> > hear suggestions.
>
> No need for suggestions, surely.  It sounds like you've got the situation
> well in hand.  We'll defer to your superior knowledge and experience and
> just wait for your solution.
>
>        - Dan C.
>
>