From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190603280723x11ba4c6cped865dfb05017f0e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:23:41 +1000
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9?
In-Reply-To: <509071940603280659v1b424162kf483be81cd290035@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8df4e392c1e8408151bd27b64b524d52@quanstro.net>
	<509071940603280659v1b424162kf483be81cd290035@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 23ccb27e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

ozinferno is based on an encrypted filesystem - the last work
i did with boyd.  i'll try and get a release together when i'm
less ill.

brucee

On 3/29/06, Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erik Quanstrom wrote:
> // i think a better route would be to build s/mime compatable signatures
> // and encryption into upas/fs and upas/marshal so applications without
> // a need to know would not have to know.
>
> i'm not really sure what you mean by that. certainly we shouldn't
> require the content-producing programs (like, say, 'cat') to know
> anything about encryption, but that idea's already totally foreign to
> plan 9 (cat --enable-encryption-with-aes-cbc?).
>
> having s/mime in upas would be wonderful, but doesn't fully address
> the needs being discussed. i want to be able to store files on disk
> securely, including across platforms. for that, i want a stand-alone
> program (hopefully, one which could then be used in upas).
>