From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190603302356k3a7dff20x5467a601ca6d9a7e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:56:07 +1100
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] new compilers
In-Reply-To: <073f792fd75a47611a51224eefc1a50e@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f9bb745fec5ce8c6bb56168f4d4958b0@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<073f792fd75a47611a51224eefc1a50e@9netics.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2937458a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

works well ... my blast room has no wires to the other rooms.
simple p9 box in the corner.  wireless audio.  and i found the
p9 box on the street. of course i can play a different song from
the studio as well, wireless (well actually it has a telco wire
for when i have to work in mutiple rooms)...

my wireless laptop can control it all.

just a few echoes (good song).

brucee

On 3/31/06, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> >> ioctl(fd, SETVOLUME, &vol); is more comfortable.
> >
> > ah, but how about
> >       echo volume 50 >/dev/audioctl
> > for understandability?
>
> i would also add:
>
> import -b noisemaker /dev
> echo volume 50 >/dev/audioctl
>
> please ioctl this!
>
>