From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190603310105j62f59a7cs26e8d58f16fa93b3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:05:37 +1100 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: [OT] linux origins, why not? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6956b4e2a756ce5e83375d399bd04455@monitorbm.co.nz> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 29cecdd8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i'm sure he's say "there's some lovely filth down here" when looking at today's favourite linux source. dhog called it "vomituous", which is not a real word, but expressed his disdain. brucee On 3/31/06, Andrew Simmons wrote: > > my interactions with jmk where talking crap while hanging around the > > coffee machine (always good) and approaching his office to ask a > > question. he'd find the right databook and often point me to the page. > > > > "dramatic irony, metaphor, bathos, puns, parody, litotes, and satire"? > > > > don't cross him, it's true. he's a mate. > > > > brucee > > > > No disrespect was intended to jmk, who clearly goes to eleven. I was > attempting to express appreciation of his droll post, using an > increasingly obscure Monty Python reference. > >