From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190604110200y58954a03t1fe11cbe1a870edd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:00:39 +1000
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Good enough approximation for ape/pcc
In-Reply-To: <186589c1b212f5f48722ffd1453a7e17@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <775b8d190604110118n70f351f9y30c8f63d0e0b73e9@mail.gmail.com>
	<186589c1b212f5f48722ffd1453a7e17@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 34bea376-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i weep for you.

brucee

On 4/11/06, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> > rob had a aimple example of some java that ":=3D" could help.
>
> i think almost any example would do: i started off writing Java using the
>        Typename variable =3D expression;
>        ...
> style but java declarations are cluttered, and it becomes so hard
> to see the part that does the work, that i reverted to C's style of
> declaring all variables at the top of the block.   it's still hard to
> see class-level functions and variables beyond all the annotations.
> syntax colouring produces visual results that sadly i find all too simila=
r to
> those ``credits completed in an entirely different style at great
> expense and at the last minute''; and thus i still can't read the code pr=
operly.
>
>