From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190610100029jd4ec05fg121988a9504dca5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:29:27 +1000 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] scuzz doesn't like CD-RW? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <7db5267fa340f1640fa439bfc2bee0b5@plan9.bell-labs.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: c7912c8c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 the tar is not keeping up with your drive. slow it down or tar to a raw partition, which is as fast a feed as you'll get. brucee On 10/10/06, cej@gli.cas.cz wrote: > I can also burn ISO CD-RW on plan9 with that drive, I forgot to mention i= t. > The problem is that I can=A7t burn a tar file directly, i.e., without cdf= s, > so I could read it thus: > tar tvf /dev/sdD0/data > > aftr blanking the cd, I got rid of that 'bus timeout' message, > probe > ready > inquiry > rewind > > all work, but I still can't write > > My problem is that I don't trust ISO-9660 and companion very much. > writing .tar instead of .iso using cdfs would probably work, but would fo= rce me to use the cdfs overhead. > > Reasoning is that if something goes wrong, I can get most of the data bac= k from tar, not so from iso. > > Thanks for the response, > best regards, > > ++pac > > > -----Original Message----- > From: 9fans-bounces+cej=3Dgli.cas.cz@cse.psu.edu [mailto:9fans-bounces+ce= j=3Dgli.cas.cz@cse.psu.edu] On Behalf Of geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 8:34 PM > To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > Subject: Re: [9fans] scuzz doesn't like CD-RW? > > I just burned a CD-R using a SCSI drive and cdfs. > > I don't think I normally use scuzz to talk to CD drives, but > > scuzz -r /dev/sd11 > ready > inquiry > > works. > >