From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190610100137n2a1722cegd869f3c9bd170459@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:37:37 +1000
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] scuzz doesn't like CD-RW?
In-Reply-To: <ea4ca671503b90ebb00ffe3f4010c030@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b1e0b5ca70455dc11dc5439f80bff346@terzarima.net>
	<ea4ca671503b90ebb00ffe3f4010c030@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c8171888-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

exactly, slow it down as previously suggested.

it's far to optimistic.

brucee

On 10/10/06, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> yet another point about cdrw: it's often sensible to reduce the
> writing speed.  first, it gives the data source more time to provide
> the data.  second, i've found i stand a better chance of reading it
> on any old cd (not just the one that wrote it).
>