From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190702052231o3ea3bb5enc29a9401a41fa753@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 17:31:49 +1100 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] setmalloctag in cc.a? In-Reply-To: <1170740479.8561.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <373eb9434727f2297175dab6b958622f@proxima.alt.za> <1170737165.7249.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1170740479.8561.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0d5ea3fc-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 well i was surprised by setmalloctag when first introduced. it's good. but if you have your own malloc then you have to stub it, it can do nothing or something good. ozinferno (Rel C) got screwed by this but simply fixed. simple answer, if you have your own malloc then think about how you can use setmalloctag to your advantage. or just stub it and ignore it's functionality. brucee On 2/6/07, Lucio De Re wrote: > > I just remembered (I happened to be going through my mailbox to make it > > a bit easier to handle and your message popped up), that I also own an > > Atmel Butterfly. It has a built-in bootstrap loader, although I confess > > I remember little of the scant documentation I read a long time ago. I > > just thought I'd mention it and use the opportunity to keep in touch. > > > > ++L > > > > PS: Excuse the mailer, I'm out of the office. > > > Oops! Bitten by the "reply-to" setting in 9fans. Please accept my > apologies, everyone. > > ++L > > >