From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190705052221x577b6709i4849e2c2a7c462a5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 15:21:28 +1000 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] speaking of kenc In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7560b2245493f07219455a36984c983f@coraid.com> <1178244537.16650.1835.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> <20070503191149.G22416@orthanc.ca> <1178245220.16650.1845.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> <20070503192201.A22416@orthanc.ca> <1178341898.8179.25.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> <775b8d190705042214u63884855t8ffd2fc84853aa84@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5b252af2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 yes i don't need imagination. all plan9 C compilers do NOT translate to asm. check it it out and learn something. ken is cleverer than that path. brucee On 5/6/07, Rogelio Serrano wrote: > On 5/5/07, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > i meant it. > > > > asm is gone, or should have been many years ago. > > > > explain a simple case when you need it. > > > > seriously? > > compiling c code. can you imagine a c compiler that does not translate > to asm first?