From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190705180023g35f2ac5r88189b18b21f303e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 17:23:18 +1000 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Not a rant. Don't disregard. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9ab217670705171133w3db0beb5gd9106fd232bb0d5@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6ba0490c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 in respect to Boyd i would say "shut the f*ck up and write some code ... or write some endless crap to a mailing list". that's why i seldom read mailing lists. nothing is more boring than "linux does it". guess what ... if it does you are lucky. if it doesn't then file an ignored bug report. shut up. brucee On 5/18/07, Navin Johnson wrote: > On 5/18/07, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > > Is anybody finding it rather ridiculous that a thread with the > > opposite title of this one is being continued to such a degree? > > Yes, it meanders wildly at times but it is all part of a process. > Forming -> Storming -> Norming -> Performing. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forming-storming-norming-performing > http://www.businessballs.com/tuckmanformingstormingnormingperforming.htm > > Yours faithfully, > Navin.r.j >