From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190712111236i4032d98bn23348c923731aee5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:36:14 +1100 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Ideas for an printer filesystem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070906235628.GC26188@nibiru.local> <13426df10711302042x78d36291n54f50beb964aa068@mail.gmail.com> <775b8d190711302054g12c4868cv2575ab16c718a43c@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1546dd18-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 No - that's would be adding a another clone interface to a driver that has a clone interface. I'll see if I can find the man page. On Dec 12, 2007 12:30 AM, roger peppe wrote: > On Dec 1, 2007 4:54 AM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > > i wrote a clonefs that changes a walk to the directory created for > > the server to an attach with ctl. it saves a lot of replicated code. > > i wonder what happened to it. it's not too hard. > > i'm not quite sure what you mean here. do you mean something > like a filesystem that layers over (for instance) /net, so doing > > walk(net/tcp) > > actually does > > id = open(/net/tcp/clone) > walk(/net/tcp/id) > > ? > > how do would you then open a file in the new directory > wthout going doing the same thing (and hence writing > to a different directory)? >