9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] frogs and osx
Date: Fri,  4 Jan 2008 21:26:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <775b8d190801040226r50719693p3ff7461f43367bcf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10feb52595053fbf209fb152851e9191@quintile.net>

Sure,

I think it's a mistake for a server to throw you frogs.  But no reason
(within reason) for the library to up-chuck on one.  But take care
where you walk.  If every protocol "violation" had to be treated as
"shit happens" then the world falls apart.

brucee

On Jan 4, 2008 9:17 PM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
> I take onboard all the commeonst made, and I am happy to
> code my own island of mutant frogs, however I wonder if there
> is a middle ground.
>
> Firstly I don't understand why the frogs are such a big problem,
> on plan9 at least a file with a \r in it appears as a
> , and this
> is a visible and easily typeable character, its true things where
> more awkward on ADM3As, but that was then.
>
> My biggest objection to the current code is a read of a directory balks
> at the \r and fails. Would it be better to hack the kernel to allow a
> read of directories containing \r and walks through them, but not
> allow read/write/stat/wstat.
>
> This would mean that such files are off limits but you can still access
> other files in the directory and those below - this feels rather
> non-othogonal maybe its a reasonable compromise.
>
> I could indeed hack u9fs but what to change the
>  to, \r perhaps, but
> that feels pretty horrid too.
>
> Is there a palatable solution?
>
> -Steve
>


  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-04 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-03 19:46 Steve Simon
2008-01-04  2:29 ` Russ Cox
2008-01-04  6:35   ` Bruce Ellis
2008-01-04  7:24   ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-01-04  7:31     ` Bruce Ellis
2008-01-04  7:37       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-01-04  7:45         ` Bruce Ellis
2008-01-04  7:45       ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2008-01-04  9:52         ` Bruce Ellis
2008-01-04 10:17           ` Steve Simon
2008-01-04 10:26             ` Bruce Ellis [this message]
2008-01-04 11:22     ` Pietro Gagliardi
2008-02-06 13:51       ` underspecified

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=775b8d190801040226r50719693p3ff7461f43367bcf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bruce.ellis@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).