From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <775b8d190803010853k11ae59d0v6a6418ab30bccdb9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  2 Mar 2008 03:53:10 +1100
From: "Bruce Ellis" <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing
In-Reply-To: <13426df10803010841m376d6c82q6fc8c62271119f76@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <894E62CC-0BBB-4709-AE29-3F78DA42EB9D@mac.com>
	<2d0933c749aac4ba2de90d7902d4ffe1@proxima.alt.za>
	<13426df10803010841m376d6c82q6fc8c62271119f76@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6b36d7dc-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Also note that neither F77 nor ratfor produced particularly good code.
They did, however, work.  Both attributes are required by the Fortran
community.

If the GCC stuff provides this service and you want to do the work
then I won't throw stones.

brucee

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 3:41 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:17 AM,  <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> > > Why not just port Version 7 f77 and Version 7 Ratfor?
> >
> >  Sounds like an idea.  Where do I find the source code?  Mind you, it's
> >  been tens of years since I programmed in Fortran IV, it's going to be
> >  hard for me to do any testing.
> >
>
> very litlle f77 left in my world, maybe somebody else has some.
>
> Ratfor? Surely you must be joking.
>
> ron
>