From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <775b8d190811101329g268aca29i912b54e89149d41@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:29:26 +0200 From: "Bruce Ellis" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081110180612.GF22532@nibiru.local> Subject: Re: [9fans] yes, comcast really *does* suck Topicbox-Message-UUID: 393b0cfc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Curiously BigPond (Big, Big, Stagnant Pond) does not block incoming 80. So if you can guess my IP you can be entertained. Maybe I'll stir the Pond again in the future. brucee On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > i was sure my copy of pathalias would somehow come into its own again. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Enrico Weigelt > To: 9fans@9fans.net > Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:06:13 +0100 > Subject: Re: [9fans] yes, comcast really *does* suck > * erik quanstrom wrote: >> > So we're building up direct (encrypted) uucp links again. Not just to >> > get around the regulation, but also not to let the spies learn what's >> > going through the wire. >> > >> > >> >> why uucp? ppp works just fine for direct connections. > > we're just talking about mail transfer, so uucp IMHO is the > easiest solution, especially if machines aren't up and online > all the day ... > > > cu > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ > > cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: info@metux.de skype: nekrad666 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >