Re: [9fans] security questions

[Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com>]

Not productive huh? That why not even Tiger reads the list anymore.
But I read mail from you.

brucee

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM,  <john@csplan9.rit.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Devon H. O'Dell <devon.odell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/4/16 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
>>>> On Thu Apr 16 22:18:35 EDT 2009, devon.odell@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> > i just stated what i thought the historical situation was.  the
>>>>> > point was only that changing direction will be difficult.
>>>>>
>>>>> This thread certainly proves that :)
>>>>
>>>> a 9fans thread proves nothing.
>>>
>>> Conceptually, anyway. Why is everyone always so hell-bent on hair-splitting? :P
>>
>> So much code, so much precision, so much specificity in dealing with
>> computers. It often spreads outside of the computational context and
>> into one's personality.
>>
>
> I'd think less that than the well-documented 9fans discussion process:
> 1. Someone brings up an idea
> 2. Half the list explains why it's bad
> 3. Trolling
> 4. Deciding on what is most "plan 9-ish"
> 5. No code is ever implemented by anyone
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>