From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] go to this site
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:11:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <784983fe8bc567adb9bc38032483ab0b@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE750B0.4020609@authentrus.com>
> >> There is a lot of residual "management doesn't understand networks and
> >> databases and operating systems so we will make decisions for them"
> >> attitude out there, even where the reality of management's background
> >> has changed. While it's true that "cloud computing" is a nonsense
> >> phrase, there are reasons why server outsourcing gains traction.
> >
> > if management really does understand things as well as
> > the it guys, then the it guys were unnecessary to begin with.
>
> Let's parse that.
[...]
> > i would hope that anyone hiring someone in such a
> > position would be interested in their input!
>
> C'mon, that's a "when did you stop beating your wife" comment. Of course
why doesn't your argument work if you switch from a
mangement to a technical perspective? i was just
turning your argument around. why would you not
want to listen to IT, unless they are getting in the way
and not doing their job? that's an argument
that runs both ways.
my assumption is that if management is doing its job, then the
problem of IT guy making policy decisions, if it happens, will
be a resolvable problem.
the argument i see you makeing is in essence that fixing management
is impracticable. i may be cynical, but i don't subscribe to that world view.
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<4AE70F74.7000505@authentrus.com>
2009-10-27 15:23 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 15:50 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 17:32 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 18:07 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 18:59 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 19:57 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 20:11 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2009-10-27 20:33 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 20:36 ` Wes Kussmaul
[not found] <<3e1162e60910270826m281a7a9awba6ea117b7351605@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-27 15:33 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-27 15:39 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-27 0:00 ron minnich
2009-10-26 20:33 ` Jacob Todd
2009-10-27 0:38 ` Joseph Stewart
2009-10-27 0:47 ` Jeff Sickel
2009-10-27 0:41 ` dave.l
2009-10-27 0:50 ` Geoffrey Avila
2009-10-27 1:52 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-10-27 2:39 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 13:03 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-27 3:21 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-10-27 3:47 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 3:49 ` ron minnich
2009-10-27 15:19 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-27 15:26 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-27 18:42 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-27 4:06 ` W B Hacker
2009-10-27 5:42 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2009-10-27 8:00 ` tlaronde
2009-10-27 8:12 ` lucio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=784983fe8bc567adb9bc38032483ab0b@coraid.com \
--to=quanstro@coraid.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).