From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7871fcf505022115527c178be0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:52:32 -0500
From: Chesky Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Evolving rio / GUI development
In-Reply-To: <991d76cb3b0fe028c65b68c44569136f@9netics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <700cc765c1dd7da842f38406724bd476@proxima.alt.za>
	<991d76cb3b0fe028c65b68c44569136f@9netics.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 12cee6b4-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:37:37 -0800, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wro=
te:
> My preference for the whole gui approach would be to have it cleanly
> separated from the applications.  Following /dev/draw's model, ideally
> a filesystem would enforce the GUI=E2=86=94application interface.  A
> refinement (not a new idea either) is to tie the whole "chrome"
> filesystem to a language like tk/tcl; tcl or lisp/scheme would not be
> my choices.
>=20

Searching the archives...
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 20:34:16 -0700, Russ Cox wrote:
> 'How I ported the [Mozilla|Konqueror]
> HTML rendering engine to plan9 and=20
> made it fit well with the rest of the system.'

2=C2=BD years from challenge to concept... ;-)

--Joel