From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7871fcf50610201227s17987c4at9bafba8729f8a6b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:27:20 -0400
From: "Joel Salomon" <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Include guards and multiple includes
In-Reply-To: <219D85AA-959D-464C-90C2-0F132809F0B9@telus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <219D85AA-959D-464C-90C2-0F132809F0B9@telus.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cf1c7632-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Is there some study kicking around that I could point them at rather
> than re-factor our code base and time the resulting builds?  I know
> the plan9 headers largely follow this pattern.

I'm fairly certain it's a stylistic/maintainability issue on Plan 9,
not an efficiency one.

--Joel