From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <7871fcf50610301114q6f67cad4j8390c9000b42568c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:14:33 -0500 From: "Joel Salomon" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] my winwatch virtual desktop-like space setup thingy... In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60610261455o79ee37bem8f46f93e6522ef72@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3e1162e60610261455o79ee37bem8f46f93e6522ef72@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d8f9040e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 10/26/06, David Leimbach wrote: > Then there's "riosession" > #!/bin/rc > > echo -n $1 > /dev/label > bind /dev/null /dev/label > sleep 2 # I actually forget why I did that > rio I added a shift and changed rio to rio $* so I could pass a starting script -- for example starting faces and acme -l lib/acme.mail.dump. This led to an interesting situation; both acmes listen to the plumber and open files and man pages. Which is easier; starting a new plumber in the new rio window (and are they disconnected?), or telling this invocation of acme only to respond to mail messages and pass opening files to some other process? --Joel