From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7871fcf50702202035t583088c8pcb05096cd15ede7f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:35:44 -0500
From: "Joel C. Salomon" <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] NaN(2)
In-Reply-To: <27e3bf985088cc336551b41938a01f8b@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <bf1c89a1c72ddd7baa5886c338bb32be@plan9.jp>
	<27e3bf985088cc336551b41938a01f8b@coraid.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 11b00ffe-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 2/20/07, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
> after a bit of actual thought, i think that NaN
> is supposed to generate a note.  if you do catch
> the note, the program should work fine.

This is distinct from sNaN/qNaN, right?

--Joel