From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7871fcf50802181020h567d47edu996b0737fbf6ba40@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:50 -0500
From: "Joel C. Salomon" <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Page-aligned executables (Was re: [9fans] Non-stack-based calling
	conventions)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10802181012p7a466841iee7c2e2609c885@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <7871fcf50802180853v7473d507w991517014e3cb4bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10802180910g45d2134cs7919137aa6f3661d@mail.gmail.com>
	<7871fcf50802181006t5eb75d7cj9ac5197aeebb9dc3@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10802181012p7a466841iee7c2e2609c885@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 597923a6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Feb 18, 2008 1:12 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> asked:
> On Feb 18, 2008 10:06 AM, Joel C. Salomon <joelcsalomon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given the 'joys' of mmap over [NFS], we *really* don't want it in Plan 9 as-is!
>
> What are those "joys" of which you speak?

...and then he answered his own question:
> It kinda works

--Joel