From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7871fcf50807031051p6c7aa89ctfe20d5cf72b4ed83@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  3 Jul 2008 13:51:21 -0400
From: "Joel C. Salomon" <joelcsalomon@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080703162509.GA14782@skaro.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1a2bf3f90e7e54101acbd732969be516@quanstro.net>
	<20080703162509.GA14782@skaro.cthulhu.dircon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bits of Plan 9 I wish were more popular...
Topicbox-Message-UUID: da5a9446-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Digby Tarvin <digbyt@acm.org> wrote:
> You are better off designing somethign that has real-time in mind
> from the start and then retrofitting the Unix/Linux compatability.

As the real-time additions to Plan 9 show, that isn't strictly
necessary -- if the kernel code base is sufficiently small and
well-designed.

--Joel